東京審判經(jīng)典臺(tái)詞

《東京審判》經(jīng)典臺(tái)詞

[衛(wèi)勃]你想想看,照現(xiàn)在的安排,你的近鄰將是美國(guó)法官和法國(guó)法官,而不是那位俄國(guó)將軍,這對(duì)你將是很愉快的.

[梅汝璈]爵士,您這樣說是侮辱我。作為一個(gè)中國(guó)人,我必須鄭重地提醒您,我不是為了愉快才來到東京的。

[衛(wèi)勃]博士,那我也不得不再次提醒您,這樣安排,是盟軍最高統(tǒng)帥的意思.如果因?yàn)槟憔芙^這個(gè)安排而使中美關(guān)系陷入了不愉快,那將是非常遺憾的,你的政府也未必同意你的這種行為.

[衛(wèi)勃]今天只是一次彩排，為什么我們不先拍一些照片，到晚上再討論明天正式開庭時(shí)的座次?

[梅汝璈]衛(wèi)勃爵士，我絕不能接受這樣的座次安排。全世界的攝影記者和新聞?dòng)浾攥F(xiàn)在都在審判大廳等著，他們必定會(huì)拍照和報(bào)道。當(dāng)這些照片和報(bào)道到了中國(guó)，你知道后果會(huì)怎么樣嗎?所有的中國(guó)人都會(huì)責(zé)難我的軟弱和無能。如果我同意了這個(gè)安排，那我就侮辱了我的國(guó)家，就侮辱了所有中國(guó)人為抗擊日本侵略者所付出的代價(jià)、犧牲、努力和堅(jiān)持，一切的一切。

[旁白]溥儀的出庭作證轟動(dòng)了東京，也轟動(dòng)了世界。整整8天，溥儀創(chuàng)造了東京審判中歷時(shí)最長(zhǎng)的作證紀(jì)錄，也頂住了以廣瀨一郎為首的戰(zhàn)犯律師團(tuán)包括威脅恐嚇在內(nèi)的輪番反詰。

[主檢察官季南]你在當(dāng)滿洲國(guó)皇帝的期間有什么權(quán)力嗎?

[溥儀]我沒有任何權(quán)力，一切都是日本人說了算。

[季南]所有事情嗎?

[溥儀]對(duì)。對(duì)了,我只有一個(gè)權(quán)力。

[季南]那是什么?

[溥儀]那就是聽他們告訴我他們所有決定的權(quán)力。

[季南]那這期間，你有個(gè)人行動(dòng)自由嗎?

[溥儀]自由?這些年，我沒有任何自由可言。簡(jiǎn)直就是猴戲。

[廣瀨一郎]你剛才說日本兵逼著你和那三個(gè)真正的僧人去xx那個(gè)姑娘?

[假和尚]是。

[廣瀨一郎]因?yàn)樗麄儾煌?，所以最后都死了，是?

[假和尚]是。

[廣瀨一郎]那你呢，你為什么活下來了?你同意了是嗎?

[假和尚](沉默)

[廣瀨一郎]回答我。你xx了那個(gè)姑娘是嗎?

[假和尚]是，我是xx了她。

[廣瀨一郎]你真的是被強(qiáng)迫的，還是你自己也想這么做?你怎么證明你是被強(qiáng)迫的?你怎么證明你不是自愿的?

[假和尚](憤怒地沖出證人席，被庭警攔住)我x你媽。。。小日本鬼子。。我操你媽。。。

[松井石根]日本同中國(guó)之間的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)，就像是亞洲大家庭中兄弟之間的爭(zhēng)吵，日本不可避免地要使用一點(diǎn)點(diǎn)強(qiáng)硬手段。這同哥哥在經(jīng)過長(zhǎng)期忍耐后，趕走不聽話的弟弟沒有什么兩樣。這樣做是為了是中國(guó)回心轉(zhuǎn)意，哥哥對(duì)弟弟的態(tài)度可能有點(diǎn)粗暴，但哥哥的出發(fā)點(diǎn)是為弟弟好。哥哥是愛弟弟的。

[季南]那我倒要問問，弟弟對(duì)哥哥的愛如何反應(yīng)?

[松井石根]這個(gè)……弟弟沒有理解這點(diǎn)，對(duì)哥哥的愛一點(diǎn)也不感到高興。

[倪征燠]你在任陸軍大臣的后期,曾經(jīng)派人去中國(guó),去見兩個(gè)人,這兩個(gè)人一個(gè)是曾經(jīng)擔(dān)任過民國(guó)政府第一任國(guó)務(wù)總理的唐紹儀,一個(gè)是前北洋軍閥的頭頭吳佩孚,是嗎?

[板垣征四郎]是.

[倪征燠]你派人去拉攏這兩個(gè)人,目的就是要成立大規(guī)模的傀儡組織,是嗎?

[板垣征四郎]我,我不知道.

[倪征燠]那你派誰取的你總知道吧?那個(gè)人是不是就是當(dāng)年僭充沈陽(yáng)市市長(zhǎng),扶植傀儡溥儀稱帝,勾結(jié)關(guān)東日軍,陰謀華北自治,煽動(dòng)內(nèi)蒙獨(dú)立,到處唆使?jié)h奸成立偽政府和維權(quán)會(huì),喧赫一時(shí),無惡不作,而今危坐在被告席右端的土肥原賢二?

板垣征四郎低頭不語(yǔ).

[倪征燠]是不是他?。馬上給我回答。

板垣征四郎點(diǎn)了頭.

土肥原賢二長(zhǎng)長(zhǎng)呼吸了下,閉了眼睛.....

[季南]那么按照你的邏輯，你一方面進(jìn)行中日之間所謂的和平交涉，另一方面卻以強(qiáng)大的兵力占領(lǐng)中國(guó)領(lǐng)土，這難道不矛盾嗎?

[東條英機(jī)]沒有任何矛盾。

[季南]那你是否考慮過侵略滿洲的結(jié)果將引起中國(guó)的反日情緒呢?

[東條英機(jī)]中國(guó)對(duì)日本的反感早有了。但是日本絕對(duì)沒有侵略滿洲的行為。

[季南]被日本軍隊(duì)殺死的中國(guó)人有多少?

[東條英機(jī)]不清楚。

[季南]日本大本營(yíng)所發(fā)表的年鑒上載明，1937年7月至1941年6月間，日本軍隊(duì)殺戮了兩百零一萬五千名中國(guó)人。殺戮兩百萬以上的中國(guó)人，你沒有想過這將引起中國(guó)人的憤怒?請(qǐng)回答。

[東條英機(jī)]我對(duì)此深感不幸。

[季南]被殺戮者不少是無辜民眾，為什么把這種殘酷行為施加在無辜的人民身上?

[東條英機(jī)]所謂民眾與戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)無關(guān)一節(jié)，中國(guó)與我們?nèi)毡径际且粯拥摹Ｗ鳛橹袊?guó)政權(quán)的統(tǒng)帥者居然指揮民眾，抗擊日本和侮辱日本以至于招來虐殺，這是中國(guó)統(tǒng)帥的錯(cuò)誤，跟我們無關(guān)。

[季南]如果你和你的同僚被無罪釋放的話，你們還準(zhǔn)備一起重復(fù)過去做過的事嗎?你們還會(huì)讓日本繼續(xù)發(fā)動(dòng)侵略、發(fā)動(dòng)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)嗎?

[東條英機(jī)](沉默良久)是。(全場(chǎng)嘩然)

[季南]我，約瑟夫·季南，代表同盟國(guó)檢察團(tuán)全體同仁鄭重向遠(yuǎn)東國(guó)際軍事法庭庭長(zhǎng)及各位法官提請(qǐng)，請(qǐng)你們給這些發(fā)動(dòng)并實(shí)行侵略戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的被告?zhèn)円試?yán)懲。以公正之心，以善良之名，以人類之愿。

[梅汝璈]柏奈爾先生，你說一個(gè)國(guó)家的文明程度取決于是否廢除了死刑，某種角度上我贊同您的觀點(diǎn)，但是我還是有些疑惑。按照您的邏輯，文明應(yīng)該被尊重，那么生命呢，生命應(yīng)該被尊重嗎?我想我不用知道您的答案，您應(yīng)該不會(huì)否認(rèn)生命是最寶貴的，因?yàn)閷?duì)每個(gè)人來說生命都只有一次。如果說杯子代表人類，水代表文明，(他將一只盛滿水的玻璃杯摔碎在地)文明是人類創(chuàng)造出來的，如果沒有人類，文明從何談起呢?……如果法律不給日本、不給這些戰(zhàn)犯以最嚴(yán)厲的懲罰，誰敢保證日本有一天不會(huì)再次挑起戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)?誰敢保證日本不會(huì)再侵略別的國(guó)家?誰敢保證日本軍國(guó)主義的幽靈不會(huì)再次復(fù)活?

[梅汝璈]巴爾先生,我再次提請(qǐng)您注意,您是一個(gè)法官。法官的職責(zé)是什么?是對(duì)罪行進(jìn)行審判進(jìn)行認(rèn)定。然后根據(jù)法律給予他們懲罰。我不知道您為什么要;來做法官,您具有一個(gè)佛教徒的偉大情懷卻在縱容犯罪,這決不是一個(gè)法官應(yīng)該有的立場(chǎng)。如果您要堅(jiān)持這樣,那您沒有資格坐在審判席上,您應(yīng)該回到印度的寺廟里去。

[梅汝璈] 我想請(qǐng)大家一起考慮這個(gè)問題：法律是什么?法律的作用又是什么?經(jīng)過兩年多的817次漫長(zhǎng)的庭審，我們終于認(rèn)定了他們有罪?？墒俏覀儯瑓s一直在討論文明和宗教。先生們，這不是大學(xué)的教堂，這也不是寺廟，這里是法律的殿堂。我們需要討論的，是怎么懲罰這些罪犯。我認(rèn)為，宗教是告訴世人怎樣做才能到達(dá)天堂。另一方面，法律明確規(guī)定了什么事情我們不能做，否則就要受懲罰，就要上斷頭臺(tái)，就要上絞刑架，這就是法律。這也是我一直堅(jiān)持對(duì)戰(zhàn)犯?jìng)兪褂盟佬痰脑颍寺訆Z別國(guó)的資源，擴(kuò)張自己的領(lǐng)土，日本還殺害了無數(shù)無辜的平民。日本軍隊(duì)，搶劫、xx、放火、殺戮……殺害了無數(shù)中國(guó)、菲律賓、英國(guó)、美國(guó)以及其他國(guó)家人民的生命。這還不足以被判處死刑嗎?如果法律不給日本、不給這些戰(zhàn)犯以最嚴(yán)厲的懲罰，誰敢保證日本有一天不會(huì)再次挑起戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)?誰敢保證日本不會(huì)再侵略別的國(guó)家?誰敢保證日本軍國(guó)主義的幽靈不會(huì)再次復(fù)活?在座哪位先生敢作這樣的保證?想說的，該說的，我都說完了。我們可以投票了。為了那些在戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)中死難的人，為了讓他們瞑目，請(qǐng)各位慎重。因?yàn)?，他們?cè)诳粗覀儭?/p>

[衛(wèi)勃]現(xiàn)在本法庭宣布判決，本法庭對(duì)于第一項(xiàng)罪狀的條約協(xié)定及諾言，發(fā)動(dòng)侵略戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的陰謀一節(jié)認(rèn)為沒有考慮的必要，因?yàn)閷?shí)行侵略戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的陰謀已經(jīng)是最高限度的犯罪。法庭宣布，所有的日本被告有罪。。。

[梅汝璈] 遠(yuǎn)東國(guó)際軍事法庭終于走到了今天，最后，七名戰(zhàn)犯被處以極刑。至今我都不敢回想，如果今天上午，我們這些贊同死刑的法官里不到六票的話，我會(huì)怎么樣?中國(guó)人又會(huì)怎么樣?世界又會(huì)怎么樣?還有，我們所有的法官都起過誓，我們永遠(yuǎn)都不能透露我們誰贊同了死刑，誰反對(duì)了死刑，我只能說，我，盡力了。

東京審判雙語(yǔ)臺(tái)詞

宣誓臺(tái)詞：

we inform that as member of international military tribunal for the far east ,we are doing administer justice according to law without fear favor or prejudiceaccording to our conscious and best understanding and there are not expose or discover.the both opinion of any particular member of tribunal upon__

or sentences,but we will preserve the __secrecy of every member. berfore we star ,a few things i want to qualify__,first of all we are not to be too formal among ourselves,so plaese cal me william.we should not treat each other equal and conside ourselves members one family .i'd hope this would be pleasant experience for all of us.now ,as the trial will be conducted on the basisi of common law system ,the sitting order of judes will be as follows ：the u.s. great britain china sveit union canada france australia ...........

對(duì)量刑的爭(zhēng)執(zhí)

(梅：我們都同意 罪犯是有罪的，我們爭(zhēng)論的焦點(diǎn)是，是否對(duì)他們處以死刑，戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)中死了那么多人，只有死刑才能讓他們瞑目，博奈爾先生，你說一個(gè)國(guó)家的文明程度取決于是否取消死刑，

博奈爾：很正確

梅：某種程度上說，我贊同你的觀點(diǎn)，但是我還是有些疑惑，

博奈爾：梅，我很樂意跟你探討

梅：按照您的邏輯，文明應(yīng)該被尊重，但您認(rèn)為生命呢，生命應(yīng)該被尊重嗎

博奈爾：我想我不用告訴你我的答案，你應(yīng)該清楚，

梅：我想您應(yīng)該不會(huì)否認(rèn)生命是最寶貴的，因?yàn)閷?duì)每一個(gè)人來說，生命只有一次，如果說這只杯子代表人類，誰代表文明，(摔破水杯)，請(qǐng)?jiān)徫业拇拄敚拿魇侨祟悇?chuàng)造的，如果沒有人類，文明從何談起?

梅：巴爾先生)

mr. bar.

mei, sit down, please. do you want to discuss buddhism between?

i know very little about buddhism, but i respect the lord, as a child, i learnt form my parents, the budd teaches people to do good and not devil. is that right?

that’s the fundamental idea

so buddhism reveals goodness, does it punish people?

yes, but the buddhism say that punishment is carried out the next life

that means if someone does evil in this life time he would pay for it in the next, right?

that’s right.

then who were going to stop the crimes here now? can budd forbid japan’s done another war? you think hideki tojo believe in budd?

budd’ll be happy to believe. budd’ll love him and forgive him for everything he has done. in the end, budd will embrace everyone.

that is far away in the future. like budd, we all long for world does no wars, no crimes, but this longing has done nothing to forbid any of the evil did come out in this world, i do not question budd’s teachings, but i double very much about ability of human beings to follow budd’s you told here. budd say believe myth dream come true, but what if these criminal develop believe budd at all. i would agree with jesus in the question bile. give to satan what is satan, and god was god’s. mr. bar, why have we come to here? the judges from 11 countries are here to determine if crimes are committed. if so, punish them according to law.

mei, don’t try to persuade me anymore. i persist in my view point is correct.

mr. bar, i do not decide to count you either, i leave you what all greece say, destiny looks better than any of us.

投票前劉松仁的最后努力

mr. paul. (mei, sit down please. you want to discuss buddhism with me?)i know very little about buddhism, but i respect their law. as a child, i learn from my parents that buddhism teach people to do good, and not evil, is that right? (that's a fundamental idea.) so buddhism rewards goodness. does it punish evil? (yes, but buddhism says that punishment is carried out the next life.) that means, if someone does evil in this lifetime, he will pay for it in the next, right? (that's right.) then what's going to stop the crimes here and now? can buddha forbid japan's starting another war? you think hideki tojo believe in buddha? (buddha will have him believe. buddha will love him, and forgive him for everything he has done. in the end, buddha will embrace everyone. that's how his power works.) that's far away in the future. like buddha, we all long for a world that has no war, no crimes, but this longing has done nothing to forbid any of the evil to come onto this world. i do not question buddha's teachings, but i doubt very much the ability of human being's to follow buddha to his utopia. buddha said, believe makes the dream come true. but what if these criminals do not believe in buddha at all? i agree with jesus in the christian bible: give to caesar what is caesar's, and to god what's god's. mr. paul, why have we come to here? the judges from eleven countries are here to determine if crimes are committed. if so, punish them according to law. (mei, don't try to persuade me any more, i still think my view point is correct.) mr. paul, i have no design to conduct you, either. i leave you with an old greek saying: destiny knows better than any of us.

sir william, and my fellow judges, you are all legal experts, so i invite you to consider this question together: what is law? what is its function? after over 2 years, and 817 long hearings, we finally determine the criminals are guilty. here in the path way, we ?? over the questions of civilization and religion. gentleman, this is not a university classroom, this is not a temple, this is a court of law, with our focusing on a ?? penalty for such serious crimes. in my opinion, religion tells us what we should do to reach heaven. on the other hand, the law lays down clearly what we should not do, or we would be punished. by death, if crimes deserved it. this is law. this is why i insist on the death penalty. in the expand of its territory, and plundering other country's resources, japan caused the death of many innocent people. its soldier rob, rape, torture, slaughter millions of chinese, philippians, englishman, americans, and people of many other nationalities. isn't it enough to justify the death sentence? if the law could not punish japan and the criminals in this serious way, who could guarantee that japan will not start another war, who could guarantee that japan will not invade another country, who dares guarantee that japan's militarism will not rise again? which one of you dares make these guarantees?

all i want to say, what i need to say, i have said it. let us cast our votes now. for the sake of those who die in the war so they can rest in peace, please be prudent, because they are watching us.

巴爾：梅，請(qǐng)坐下，你想跟 我討論佛學(xué)嗎

梅：對(duì)于佛學(xué)，我知之甚少，但我非常尊敬佛學(xué)，小時(shí)候我就從我父母那兒學(xué)到，佛鼓勵(lì)人行善少作惡

巴爾：這是最基本的

梅：那佛除了揚(yáng)善，是不是還懲惡?

巴爾：是，但是佛講的是來世再報(bào)

梅：也就是說，人類今世的罪惡來世必有報(bào)?

巴爾：是

梅：但今世的罪惡由誰來懲罰，佛能制止日本不再發(fā)動(dòng)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)，東條英機(jī)會(huì)信佛?

巴爾：佛會(huì)讓他信，佛會(huì)愛他，佛會(huì)原諒所有的一切，最后每個(gè)人都會(huì)回到佛的懷抱，這是佛的力量

梅：那時(shí)將來，我和佛一樣期待人間沒有戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)，沒有罪惡，但精神的期待能夠左右現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中發(fā)生的種種不堪的丑惡，對(duì)人性的踐踏?我不懷疑佛的力量，但我懷疑人間是否都能在佛的指引下走向光明，佛家不是說信則靈不信則不靈嗎?那些人要是不信呢我倒贊成西方那句諺語(yǔ)：叫“上帝的歸上帝，凱撒的歸凱撒”巴爾先生，我們?yōu)槭裁磥淼竭@兒，我們十一國(guó)法官 來到這里就是為了審判，所以，我要求對(duì)他們依法嚴(yán)懲。

巴爾：梅，用不著再說服我了，我依然堅(jiān)持認(rèn)為我的觀點(diǎn)是對(duì)的

梅：巴爾，我也不會(huì)再去說服你了，我想最后再對(duì)你說一句古希臘諺語(yǔ)：命運(yùn)比我們更精確。

老衛(wèi)：好吧，我知道下一個(gè)該輪到我了

梅：老衛(wèi)，我的法官同事們，你們都是資深法學(xué)家，我想請(qǐng)大家一起來思考這樣一個(gè)問題，法律是什么?經(jīng)過了兩年多817次漫長(zhǎng)的庭審，我們終于認(rèn)定他們有罪，可我們卻在討論文明和宗教，先生們，這不是大學(xué)的課堂，也不是廟宇，這是法律的殿堂，我們要討論的是怎么仰來懲罰這些罪犯，我認(rèn)為，宗教是要告訴世人，怎樣做才能上天堂，另一方面，法律明確規(guī)定了什么事不能做，否則就要受到懲罰，就要上斷頭臺(tái)，就要上絞刑架，這就是法律，這也就是我一直主張對(duì)這些罪犯使用死刑的原因，除了掠奪別國(guó)擴(kuò)大自己的領(lǐng)土，日本還殺害了無數(shù)平民，日軍搶劫，xx，放火，殺戮，殺害了無數(shù)中國(guó)，菲律賓，英國(guó)，美國(guó)，以及其他國(guó)家人民的生命，這還不足以判處死刑?如果今天不給日本不給戰(zhàn)犯以最嚴(yán)厲的懲罰，誰敢保證日本有一天不再挑起戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)，誰敢保證?誰敢保證日本不再侵犯別的國(guó)家，誰?日本軍國(guó)主義的幽靈不再?gòu)?fù)活，在座的各位誰敢保證?想說的該說的我全都說完了，我們可以投票了，為了那些在戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)中四去的人們，為了讓他們瞑目，請(qǐng)各位慎重，因?yàn)?，他們?cè)诳粗覀儭?/p>